Electromagnetic tracking - Revision history

Xinreality at 21:21, 7 May 2025

2025-05-07T21:21:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 7 May 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==History==		==History==
	Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 [[Space-Tracker]], followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref name="FASTRAK2018">Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System — Product Overview.” PDF brochure, 2018. Accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref><ref name="Flock2002">Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® Installation and Operation Guide,'' Rev B (2002).</ref>		Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 [[Space-Tracker]], followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref name="FASTRAK2018">Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System - Product Overview.” PDF brochure, 2018. Accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref><ref name="Flock2002">Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® Installation and Operation Guide,'' Rev B (2002).</ref>
	During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref name="Hayden2018">Hayden S. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Release on Track for 2018.” ''Road to VR,'' 21 Jun 2018.</ref><ref name="Razer2011">Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 21 Apr 2011.</ref>		During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref name="Hayden2018">Hayden S. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Release on Track for 2018.” ''Road to VR,'' 21 Jun 2018.</ref><ref name="Razer2011">Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 21 Apr 2011.</ref>

	==Principles of operation==		==Principles of operation==
	A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.<ref name="pciBIRD">Ascension Technology Corp. “pciBIRD — Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking.” Product sheet, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref>		A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.<ref name="pciBIRD">Ascension Technology Corp. “pciBIRD - Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking.” Product sheet, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref>
	For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref name="Jackson1998">Jackson J. D. ''Classical Electrodynamics,'' 3rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>		For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref name="Jackson1998">Jackson J. D. ''Classical Electrodynamics,'' 3rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>

Line 18:		Line 18:

	===Sensors===		===Sensors===
	Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref name="AuroraTools">Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking — Sensors & Tools.” Product page, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.		Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref name="AuroraTools">Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking - Sensors & Tools.” Product page, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.

	===Performance===		===Performance===

Xinreality at 16:11, 1 May 2025

2025-05-01T16:11:34Z

Xinreality: Undo revision 34810 by Xinreality (talk)

2025-05-01T08:35:41Z

Undo revision 34810 by Xinreality (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 1 May 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Principles of operation==		==Principles of operation==
	A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.		A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.<ref>Ascension Technology Corp. “Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking Technology Overview.” White paper, 2003.</ref>
	For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref>Jackson J.D. ''Classical Electrodynamics'', 3 rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>		For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref>Jackson J.D. ''Classical Electrodynamics'', 3 rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>

Xinreality at 08:35, 1 May 2025

2025-05-01T08:35:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 1 May 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Principles of operation==		==Principles of operation==
	A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.~~<ref>Ascension Technology Corp. “Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking Technology Overview.” White paper, 2003.</ref>~~		A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.
	For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref>Jackson J.D. ''Classical Electrodynamics'', 3 rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>		For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref>Jackson J.D. ''Classical Electrodynamics'', 3 rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>

Xinreality at 10:57, 30 April 2025

2025-04-30T10:57:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 30 April 2025
Line 59:		Line 59:
	[[Category:Terms]]		[[Category:Terms]]
	[[Category:Technical Terms]]		[[Category:Technical Terms]]
			[[Category:Tracking]]
			[[Category:Types of tracking]]
	[[Category:Motion tracking]]		[[Category:Motion tracking]]
	[[Category:Magnetic technology]]		[[Category:Magnetic technology]]
	[[Category:Human–computer interaction]]		[[Category:Human–computer interaction]]
	[[Category:Medical navigation]]		[[Category:Medical navigation]]

Xinreality at 10:57, 30 April 2025

2025-04-30T10:57:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 30 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
			{{see also\|Tracking}}
	[[Electromagnetic tracking]] ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[virtual reality]] (VR), [[augmented reality]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics\|robot–computer interaction]].		[[Electromagnetic tracking]] ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[virtual reality]] (VR), [[augmented reality]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics\|robot–computer interaction]].
	Unlike camera-based [[optical tracking]] or pure [[inertial tracking]], EMT determines the ''six-degree-of-freedom'' ([[6DOF]]) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary [[field generator]] produces a precisely controlled magnetic field. Tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers '''no cumulative drift''', while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref>Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): 876-892 (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>		Unlike camera-based [[optical tracking]] or pure [[inertial tracking]], EMT determines the ''six-degree-of-freedom'' ([[6DOF]]) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary [[field generator]] produces a precisely controlled magnetic field. Tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers '''no cumulative drift''', while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref>Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): 876-892 (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>

Xinreality at 10:56, 30 April 2025

2025-04-30T10:56:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 30 April 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:
	==References==		==References==
	<references/>		<references/>

			[[Category:Terms]]
			[[Category:Technical Terms]]
			[[Category:Motion tracking]]
			[[Category:Magnetic technology]]
			[[Category:Human–computer interaction]]
			[[Category:Medical navigation]]

Xinreality at 10:46, 30 April 2025

2025-04-30T10:46:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 30 April 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==History==		==History==
	Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 ~~“Space~~-Tracker,” followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref>Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System – Product Overview.” Polhemus.com, accessed 30 April 2025.</ref><ref>Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® User Manual'', Rev G (1999).</ref>		Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 [[Space-Tracker]], followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref>Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System – Product Overview.” Polhemus.com, accessed 30 April 2025.</ref><ref>Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® User Manual'', Rev G (1999).</ref>
	During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref>Lang B. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Suggests 2018 Headset Launch.” ''Road to VR'', 20 Sept 2017.</ref><ref>Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 11 Apr 2011.</ref>		During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref>Lang B. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Suggests 2018 Headset Launch.” ''Road to VR'', 20 Sept 2017.</ref><ref>Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 11 Apr 2011.</ref>

Xinreality: Undo revision 34774 by Xinreality (talk)

2025-04-30T10:45:48Z

Undo revision 34774 by Xinreality (talk)

Show changes

Xinreality at 10:44, 30 April 2025

2025-04-30T10:44:57Z

Show changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 1 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}		{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
	{{see also\|Tracking}}		{{see also\|Tracking}}

	[[Electromagnetic tracking]] ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[virtual reality]] (VR), [[augmented reality]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics\|robot–computer interaction]].		[[Electromagnetic tracking]] ('''EMT''') is a [[Pose]]-estimation technology widely used in [[virtual reality]] (VR), [[augmented reality]] (AR), medical navigation, and human–[[robotics\|robot–computer interaction]].
	Unlike camera-based [[optical tracking]] or pure [[inertial tracking]], EMT determines the ''six-degree-of-freedom'' ([[6DOF]]) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary [[field generator]] produces a precisely controlled magnetic field. Tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers '''no cumulative drift''', while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref>Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): ~~876-892~~ (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>		Unlike camera-based [[optical tracking]] or pure [[inertial tracking]], EMT determines the ''six-degree-of-freedom'' ([[6DOF]]) position and orientation of miniature sensor coils without requiring line-of-sight. A stationary [[field generator]] produces a precisely controlled magnetic field. Tri-axial receiver coils measure that field, and the system solves for each sensor’s pose every frame. Because each frame is computed independently, EMT suffers '''no cumulative drift''', while latencies are typically only a few milliseconds.<ref name="Yaniv2009">Yaniv Z., Wilson E., Lindisch D., Cleary K. “Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.” ''Medical Physics'' 36 (3): 876–892 (2009). doi:10.1118/1.3075829.</ref>

	==History==		==History==
	Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 [[Space-Tracker]], followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref>Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System – Product Overview.” ~~Polhemus~~.~~com, accessed~~ 30 ~~April~~ 2025.</ref><ref>Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® ~~User Manual~~'', Rev G (~~1999~~).</ref>		Commercial EMT began with [[Polhemus]]’s 1969 [[Space-Tracker]], followed by its FASTRAK line in the 1980s and [[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]]’s pulsed-DC ‘‘Flock of Birds’’ (1991).<ref name="FASTRAK2018">Polhemus. “FASTRAK® Motion Tracking System — Product Overview.” PDF brochure, 2018. Accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref><ref name="Flock2002">Ascension Technology Corp. ''Flock of Birds® Installation and Operation Guide,'' Rev B (2002).</ref>
	During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref>~~Lang B~~. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, ~~Suggests~~ 2018 ~~Headset Launch~~.” ''Road to VR''~~, 20 Sept 2017~~.</ref><ref>Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 11 Apr 2011.</ref>		During the 1990s EMT migrated from military simulators into VR CAVEs and into medical navigation. Key medical trackers such as [[NDI Aurora]] (2002) made EMT the de-facto standard for surgical tool tracking. Consumer products followed: the [[Razer Hydra]] PC controller (2011) and the “Control” wand for the original [[Magic Leap One]] AR headset (2018) both employ EMT.<ref name="Hayden2018">Hayden S. “Magic Leap One Controller Appears in FCC Filing, Release on Track for 2018.” ''Road to VR,'' 21 Jun 2018.</ref><ref name="Razer2011">Razer Inc. “Thanks to the Razer Hydra, Now You’re Thinking With Motion Control.” Press release, 21 Apr 2011.</ref>

	==Principles of operation==		==Principles of operation==
	A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.<ref>Ascension Technology Corp. ~~“Pulsed~~ DC Magnetic Tracking ~~Technology Overview~~.” ~~White paper~~, ~~2003~~.</ref>		A field generator contains three orthogonal transmitter coils driven sequentially (AC systems) or in short pulses (pulsed-DC systems). Each receiver holds three orthogonal pick-up coils. As every axis is energized, the induced voltages encode the local magnetic-field vector; an over-determined least-squares solve yields 3-D position and orientation.<ref name="pciBIRD">Ascension Technology Corp. “pciBIRD — Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking.” Product sheet, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref>
	For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref>Jackson J.D. ''Classical Electrodynamics''~~, 3 rd~~ ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>		For an ideal magnetic dipole the far-field magnitude decays with the inverse cube of distance (\|B\| ∝ 1/''r''³), sharply limiting working volume.<ref name="Jackson1998">Jackson J. D. ''Classical Electrodynamics,'' 3rd ed. Wiley (1998) p. 181.</ref>

	==Technical characteristics==		==Technical characteristics==
	===Field Generators===		===Field Generators===
	Transmitters are supplied as planar plates, cube frames, or towers. A standard Polhemus FASTRAK source covers ≈1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.5 m at up to 120 Hz.<ref>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.” PDF, 2020.</ref>		Transmitters are supplied as planar plates, cube frames, or towers. A standard Polhemus FASTRAK source covers ≈ 1.5 m × 1.5 m × 1.5 m at up to 120 Hz.<ref name="PolhemusChart2020">Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.” PDF, 2020. Accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref>

	===Sensors===		===Sensors===
	Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref>Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking – Sensors & Tools.” ~~NDigital.com~~, accessed 30 ~~April~~ 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.		Modern sensors are extremely small: the Aurora 6DOF “micro” sensor is only 1.8 mm Ø, while its smallest 5DOF sensor is 0.3 mm Ø.<ref name="AuroraTools">Northern Digital Inc. “Aurora Electromagnetic Tracking — Sensors & Tools.” Product page, accessed 30 Apr 2025.</ref> A single Aurora controller can track up to 32 5DOF or 16 6DOF sensors.

	===Performance===		===Performance===
	Static laboratory accuracy for FASTRAK is ≈0.76 mm RMS and 0.15° RMS<ref~~>Polhemus. “Motion Tracking Technical Comparison Chart.”<~~/~~ref~~>; update rates range 50–120 Hz; latency is 3–10 ms. Real-world performance degrades near conductive or ferromagnetic objects, high-current devices, or at distances >1 m, where the field drops rapidly.		Static laboratory accuracy for FASTRAK is ≈ 0.76 mm RMS and 0.15° RMS;<ref name="PolhemusChart2020" /> update rates range 50–120 Hz; latency is 3–10 ms. Real-world performance degrades near conductive or ferromagnetic objects, high-current devices, or at distances > 1 m, where the field drops rapidly.

	===AC vs. Pulsed-DC===		===AC vs. Pulsed-DC===
	AC trackers (Polhemus, NDI) supply strong continuous fields but are susceptible to eddy-current distortion. Pulsed-DC trackers (Ascension “Bird”) reduce such distortion at the cost of lower refresh rates.<ref~~>Ascension Technology Corp. “Pulsed DC Magnetic Tracking Technology Overview.”<~~/~~ref~~>		AC trackers (Polhemus, NDI) supply strong continuous fields but are susceptible to eddy-current distortion. Pulsed-DC trackers (Ascension “Bird”) reduce such distortion at the cost of lower refresh rates.<ref name="pciBIRD" />

	==Comparison with Other Tracking Modalities==		==Comparison with Other Tracking Modalities==
Line 29:		Line 30:
	! Modality !! Key strengths !! Key limitations		! Modality !! Key strengths !! Key limitations
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''EMT''' \|\| Drift-free absolute pose; works through occlusion & darkness; sensors millimetres in size \|\| Limited to ≲1 m volumes; distorted by nearby metal; magnetic interference		\| '''EMT''' \|\| Drift-free absolute pose; works through occlusion & darkness; sensors millimetres in size \|\| Limited to ≲ 1 m volumes; distorted by nearby metal; magnetic interference
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[Optical tracking]] \|\| Sub-mm accuracy, room-scale, unaffected by metal \|\| Requires clear line-of-sight & lighting; suffers from occlusion		\| [[Optical tracking]] \|\| Sub-mm accuracy, room-scale, unaffected by metal \|\| Requires clear line-of-sight & lighting; suffers from occlusion
Line 36:		Line 37:
	\|}		\|}

	Hybrid camera-IMU systems such as [[Microsoft HoloLens]] and [[Meta Quest Pro]] achieve room-scale tracking; EMT is sometimes fused in research prototypes to re-localise after optical dropout.<ref~~>Yaniv Z. et al., 2009.<~~/~~ref~~>		Hybrid camera-IMU systems such as [[Microsoft HoloLens]] and [[Meta Quest Pro]] achieve room-scale tracking; EMT is sometimes fused in research prototypes to re-localise after optical dropout.<ref name="Yaniv2009" />

	==Applications==		==Applications==
	* '''Consumer / gaming''' – The [[Razer Hydra]] offered ≈1 mm/1° precision over a 1-m radius base station; Magic Leap One’s hand-held controller transmits three AC fields at 28.5–42.4 kHz for EMT.<ref~~>Lang B., 2017.<~~/~~ref~~>		* '''Consumer / gaming''' – The [[Razer Hydra]] offered ≈ 1 mm / 1° precision over a 1-m radius base station; Magic Leap One’s hand-held controller transmits three AC fields at 28.5–42.4 kHz for EMT.<ref name="Hayden2018" />
	* '''Medical navigation''' – [[NDI Aurora]] and Ascension 3D Guidance track needles, catheters, and endoscopes during minimally invasive procedures where cameras cannot see.<ref~~>Yaniv Z. et al., 2009.<~~/~~ref~~>		* '''Medical navigation''' – [[NDI Aurora]] and Ascension 3D Guidance track needles, catheters, and endoscopes during minimally invasive procedures where cameras cannot see.<ref name="Yaniv2009" />
	* '''Industrial / research''' – Welding simulators, robot hand-guiding in metallic cells, marker-less motion capture under clothing, and ergonomics studies use EMT where optical solutions fail.		* '''Industrial / research''' – Welding simulators, robot hand-guiding in metallic cells, marker-less motion capture under clothing, and ergonomics studies use EMT where optical solutions fail.

	==Strengths and limitations==		==Strengths and limitations==
	EMT provides drift-free, low-latency 6DOF tracking in darkness, inside the body, or through clothing, with sensors small enough to embed in tools.		EMT provides drift-free, low-latency 6DOF tracking in darkness, inside the body, or through clothing, with sensors small enough to embed in tools.
	However, accuracy degrades rapidly outside the calibrated volume and in the presence of metal or strong fields. Interference studies show position errors rising from <1 mm to >30 mm when powered instruments are held <30 cm from the receiver.<ref>Poulin F., Amiot L-P. “Interference during the use of an electromagnetic tracking system under OR conditions.” ''Journal of Biomechanics'' 35 (6): ~~733~~-~~737~~ (~~2002~~).</ref>		However, accuracy degrades rapidly outside the calibrated volume and in the presence of metal or strong fields. Interference studies show position errors rising from < 1 mm to > 30 mm when powered instruments are held < 30 cm from the receiver.<ref name="Poulin2002">Poulin F., Amiot L-P. “Interference during the use of an electromagnetic tracking system under OR conditions.” ''Journal of Biomechanics'' 35 (6): 733–737 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00036-2.</ref>

	==Notable commercial systems==		==Notable commercial systems==
	* '''[[Polhemus]] FASTRAK / LIBERTY''' – AC; ≤0.76 mm RMS position, 0.15° orientation; up to 120 Hz.		* '''[[Polhemus]] FASTRAK / LIBERTY''' – AC; ≤ 0.76 mm RMS position, 0.15° orientation; up to 120 Hz.
	* '''[[NDI Aurora]]''' – Medical-grade AC; up to 32 sensors; micro-sensors Ø0.3–1.8 mm.		* '''[[NDI Aurora]]''' – Medical-grade AC; up to 32 sensors; micro-sensors Ø 0.3–1.8 mm.
	* '''[[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]] 3D Guidance / Flock of Birds''' – Pulsed-DC; 144 Hz typical.		* '''[[Ascension Technology\|Ascension]] 3D Guidance / Flock of Birds''' – Pulsed-DC; 144 Hz typical.
	* '''[[Razer Hydra]] / Sixense STEM''' – Consumer dual-wand game controller (2011).		* '''[[Razer Hydra]] / Sixense STEM''' – Consumer dual-wand game controller (2011).