Depth cue - Revision history

Xinreality: Undo revision 34813 by Xinreality (talk)

2025-05-01T16:02:17Z

Undo revision 34813 by Xinreality (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 1 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}		{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
	[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/~~knowledge-base~~/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.b.~~VisualDepthCues~~.html</ref>		[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.c.DepthCues.html</ref>

	== Classification of Depth Cues ==		== Classification of Depth Cues ==
Line 82:		Line 82:

	====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====		====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====
	A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/~~2024~~/01/29/~~understanding~~-~~vergence~~-~~accommodation~~-~~conflict~~-in-ar-vr-~~headsets~~/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/~~blog~~/~~exploring~~-the-~~focal~~-~~distance~~-~~in-vr-headsets~~</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>		A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/2022/06/22/5-ways-to-address-ars-vergence-accommodation-conflict/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/research/virtual-reality-the-vergence-accommodation-conflict/</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>

	The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:		The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:
Line 101:		Line 101:
	To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:		To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:

	'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>		'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800 https://www.computationalimaging.org/publications/accommodation-invariant-near-eye-displays-siggraph-2017/</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>

	'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.		'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.

Xinreality at 16:00, 1 May 2025

2025-05-01T16:00:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 1 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}		{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
	[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/~~knowledge_base~~/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.c.~~DepthCues~~.html</ref>		[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge-base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.b.VisualDepthCues.html</ref>

	== Classification of Depth Cues ==		== Classification of Depth Cues ==
Line 82:		Line 82:

	====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====		====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====
	A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/~~2022~~/06/22/5-~~ways~~-to-~~address~~-~~ars~~-~~vergence~~-~~accommodation~~-~~conflict~~/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/~~research~~/~~virtual~~-~~reality~~-~~the~~-~~vergence~~-~~accommodation~~-~~conflict/~~</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>		A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/2024/01/29/understanding-vergence-accommodation-conflict-in-ar-vr-headsets/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/blog/exploring-the-focal-distance-in-vr-headsets</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>

	The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:		The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:
Line 101:		Line 101:
	To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:		To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:

	'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800 ~~https://www.computationalimaging.org/publications/accommodation-invariant-near-eye-displays-siggraph-2017/~~</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>		'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>

	'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.		'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.

Xinreality at 16:00, 1 May 2025

2025-05-01T16:00:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 1 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}		{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
	[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/~~knowledge-base~~/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.b.~~VisualDepthCues~~.html</ref>		[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge_base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.c.DepthCues.html</ref>

	== Classification of Depth Cues ==		== Classification of Depth Cues ==
Line 82:		Line 82:

	====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====		====The [[Vergence-Accommodation Conflict]] (VAC)====
	A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/~~2024~~/01/29/~~understanding~~-~~vergence~~-~~accommodation~~-~~conflict~~-in-ar-vr-~~headsets~~/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/~~blog~~/~~exploring~~-the-~~focal~~-~~distance~~-~~in-vr-headsets~~</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>		A major limitation in most current VR/AR displays is the mismatch between vergence and accommodation cues. Most headsets use [[fixed-focus display]]s, meaning the optics present the virtual image at a fixed focal distance (often 1.5-2 meters or optical infinity), regardless of the simulated distance of the virtual object. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/2022/06/22/5-ways-to-address-ars-vergence-accommodation-conflict/</ref> <ref name="WikiVAC">Vergence-accommodation conflict - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergence-accommodation_conflict</ref> <ref name="DeliverContactsFocus">(2024-07-18) Exploring the Focal Distance in VR Headsets - Deliver Contacts. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://delivercontacts.com/research/virtual-reality-the-vergence-accommodation-conflict/</ref> While the user's eyes converge appropriately for the virtual object's simulated distance (for example 0.5 meters), their eyes must maintain focus (accommodate) at the fixed optical distance of the display itself to keep the image sharp. This mismatch between the distance signaled by vergence and the distance signaled by accommodation is known as the '''[[vergence-accommodation conflict]]''' (VAC). <ref name="HoffmanVAC2008">Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., & Banks, M. S. (2008). Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 33. doi:10.1167/8.3.33</ref> <ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref> <ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>

	The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:		The VAC forces the brain to deal with conflicting depth information, potentially leading to several issues:
Line 101:		Line 101:
	To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:		To mitigate or eliminate the VAC and provide more accurate depth cues, researchers and companies are actively developing advanced display technologies:

	'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>		'''[[Varifocal Displays]]''': These displays dynamically adjust the focal distance of the display optics (for example using physically moving lenses/screens, [[liquid lens]] technology, or [[deformable mirror]] devices) to match the simulated distance of the object the user is currently looking at. <ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800 https://www.computationalimaging.org/publications/accommodation-invariant-near-eye-displays-siggraph-2017/</ref> <ref name="DunnVarifocal2017">Dunn, David, et al. (2017). Wide field of view varifocal near-eye display using see-through deformable membrane mirrors. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 23*(4), 1322-1331.</ref> This typically requires fast and accurate [[eye tracking]] to determine the user's point of gaze and intended focus depth. Varifocal systems often simulate [[Depth of Field]] effects computationally, blurring parts of the scene not at the current focal distance. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> Prototypes like Meta Reality Labs' "Half Dome" series have demonstrated this approach. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/>

	'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.		'''[[Multifocal Displays]] (Multi-Plane Displays)''': Instead of a single, continuously adjusting focus, these displays present content on multiple discrete focal planes simultaneously or in rapid succession. <ref name="AkeleyMultifocal2004">Akeley, Kurt, Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S. (2004). A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 23*(3), 804-813.</ref> The visual system can then accommodate to the plane closest to the target object's depth. Examples include stacked display panels or systems using switchable lenses. Magic Leap 1 used a two-plane system. <ref name="ARInsiderVAC"/> While reducing VAC, they can still exhibit quantization effects if an object lies between planes, and complexity increases with the number of planes.

Xinreality at 06:46, 29 April 2025

2025-04-29T06:46:01Z

Show changes

Xinreality: Text replacement - "e.g.," to "for example"

2025-04-29T04:22:47Z

Text replacement - "e.g.," to "for example"

Xinreality: /* References */

2025-04-25T12:00:48Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 25 April 2025
Line 176:		Line 176:
	<ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref>		<ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref>
	<ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>		<ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>
	<ref name="VosVAC2005">Vos, G. A., Barfield, W., & Yamamoto, T. (2005). The Virtual Vertical: Depth Perception and Discomfort in Stereoscopic Displays. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14(6), 649-664.</ref>
	<ref name="JonesVAC2008">Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R. (2008). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 9-16.</ref>		<ref name="JonesVAC2008">Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R. (2008). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 9-16.</ref>
	<ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref>		<ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref>
Line 184:		Line 183:
	<ref name="Lanman2013">Lanman, D., & Luebke, D. (2013). Near-eye light field displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(6), 1-10. doi:10.1145/2508363.2508366</ref>		<ref name="Lanman2013">Lanman, D., & Luebke, D. (2013). Near-eye light field displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(6), 1-10. doi:10.1145/2508363.2508366</ref>
	<ref name="MaimoneHolo2017">Maimone, A., Georgiou, A., & Kollin, J. S. (2017). Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4), 1-16. doi:10.1145/3072959.3073610</ref>		<ref name="MaimoneHolo2017">Maimone, A., Georgiou, A., & Kollin, J. S. (2017). Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4), 1-16. doi:10.1145/3072959.3073610</ref>
	~~<ref name="HowardRogers2012Vol3">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 3: Other Mechanisms of Depth Perception. Oxford University Press.</ref>~~
	<ref name="PubMedOcclusionAR">Kiyokawa, K., Billinghurst, M., Hayes, S. E., & Gupta, A. (2003). An occlusion-capable optical see-through head mount display for supporting co-located collaboration. Proceedings. ISMAR 2003. Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 133-141. doi:10.1109/ISMAR.2003.1240688</ref>
	<ref name="ChangEyeTrack2020">Chang, Jen-Hao Rick, et al. (2020). Toward a unified framework for hand-eye coordination in virtual reality. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE.</ref>
	<ref name="WillemsenHMD2009">Willemsen, Peter, Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 6(2), 1-14.</ref>
	<ref name="WannAdaptation1995">Wann, John P., Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision research, 35(19), 2731-2736.</ref>		<ref name="WannAdaptation1995">Wann, John P., Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision research, 35(19), 2731-2736.</ref>
	<ref name="ShibataComfortZone2011">Shibata, Takashi, Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., & Banks, M. S. (2011). The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of vision, 11(8), 11-11.</ref>		<ref name="ShibataComfortZone2011">Shibata, Takashi, Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., & Banks, M. S. (2011). The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of vision, 11(8), 11-11.</ref>
	<ref name="DuchowskiDoF2014">Duchowski, Andrew T., et al. (2014). Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 34(5), 34-41.</ref>		<ref name="DuchowskiDoF2014">Duchowski, Andrew T., et al. (2014). Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 34(5), 34-41.</ref>
	~~<ref name="ErnstCrossModal2002">Ernst, Marc O., and Martin S. Banks. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433.</ref>~~
	<ref name="MildenhallNeRF2020">Mildenhall, Ben, et al. (2020). Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham.</ref>		<ref name="MildenhallNeRF2020">Mildenhall, Ben, et al. (2020). Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham.</ref>
	</references>		</references>

Xinreality at 11:59, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T11:59:16Z

Show changes

Xinreality at 10:46, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T10:46:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 25 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''~~Depth cue~~'''~~ is any of a variety of perceptual signals that ~~allows~~ the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge-base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.b.VisualDepthCues.html</ref>		{{see also\|Terms\|Technical Terms}}
			[[Depth cue]] is any of a variety of perceptual signals that allow the [[human visual system]] to infer the distance or depth of objects in a scene, enabling the brain to transform two-dimensional retinal images into a perception of three-dimensional space. <ref name="HowardRogers2012">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 1: Basic Mechanisms. Oxford University Press.</ref> These cues are crucial for navigating the three-dimensional world and are fundamental to creating convincing, immersive, and comfortable experiences in [[Virtual Reality]] (VR) and [[Augmented Reality]] (AR), where reproducing accurate depth perception presents significant technical challenges. <ref name="HowardRogers1995">Howard, Ian P., and Brian J. Rogers. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford University Press.</ref> The brain automatically fuses multiple available depth cues to build a robust model of the spatial layout of the environment. <ref name="HITLCues1">(2014-06-20) Visual Depth Cues - Human Interface Technology Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/knowledge-base/virtual-worlds/EVE/III.A.1.b.VisualDepthCues.html</ref>

	== Classification of Depth Cues ==		== Classification of Depth Cues ==

Xinreality: /* References */

2025-04-25T10:45:34Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 25 April 2025
Line 173:		Line 173:
	<ref name="ScienceLearnParallax">Depth perception. Science Learning Hub – Pokapū Akoranga Pūtaiao. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/107-depth-perception</ref>		<ref name="ScienceLearnParallax">Depth perception. Science Learning Hub – Pokapū Akoranga Pūtaiao. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/107-depth-perception</ref>
	<ref name="WallachOConnell1953">Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 205–217. doi:10.1037/h0058000</ref>		<ref name="WallachOConnell1953">Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 205–217. doi:10.1037/h0058000</ref>
	~~<ref name="NawrotMotion2003">Nawrot, Mark. (2003). Eye movements provide the extra-retinal signal required for the perception of depth from motion parallax. Vision research, 43(14), 1553-1562.</ref>~~
	<ref name="KudoOcularParallax1988">Kudo, Hiromi, and Hirohiko Ono. (1988). Depth perception, ocular parallax, and stereopsis. Perception, 17(4), 473-480.</ref>		<ref name="KudoOcularParallax1988">Kudo, Hiromi, and Hirohiko Ono. (1988). Depth perception, ocular parallax, and stereopsis. Perception, 17(4), 473-480.</ref>
	<ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/2024/01/29/understanding-vergence-accommodation-conflict-in-ar-vr-headsets/</ref>		<ref name="ARInsiderVAC">(2024-01-29) Understanding Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in AR/VR Headsets - AR Insider. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from https://arinsider.co/2024/01/29/understanding-vergence-accommodation-conflict-in-ar-vr-headsets/</ref>

Xinreality at 10:45, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T10:45:16Z

Show changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 25 April 2025
Line 176:		Line 176:
	<ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref>		<ref name="FacebookVAC2019">Facebook Research. (2019, March 28). Vergence-Accommodation Conflict: Facebook Research Explains Why Varifocal Matters For Future VR. YouTube. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWA4gVibKJE]</ref>
	<ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>		<ref name="KramidaVAC2016">Kramida, Gregory. (2016). Resolving the vergence-accommodation conflict in head-mounted displays. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(7), 1912-1931.</ref>
	<ref name="VosVAC2005">Vos, G. A., Barfield, W., & Yamamoto, T. (2005). The Virtual Vertical: Depth Perception and Discomfort in Stereoscopic Displays. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 14(6), 649-664.</ref>
	<ref name="JonesVAC2008">Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R. (2008). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 9-16.</ref>		<ref name="JonesVAC2008">Jones, J. A., Swan II, J. E., Singh, G., & Ellis, S. R. (2008). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 9-16.</ref>
	<ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref>		<ref name="KonradVAC2016">Konrad, R., Cooper, E. A., & Banks, M. S. (2016). Towards the next generation of virtual and augmented reality displays. Optics Express, 24(15), 16800-16809. doi:10.1364/OE.24.016800</ref>
Line 184:		Line 183:
	<ref name="Lanman2013">Lanman, D., & Luebke, D. (2013). Near-eye light field displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(6), 1-10. doi:10.1145/2508363.2508366</ref>		<ref name="Lanman2013">Lanman, D., & Luebke, D. (2013). Near-eye light field displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(6), 1-10. doi:10.1145/2508363.2508366</ref>
	<ref name="MaimoneHolo2017">Maimone, A., Georgiou, A., & Kollin, J. S. (2017). Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4), 1-16. doi:10.1145/3072959.3073610</ref>		<ref name="MaimoneHolo2017">Maimone, A., Georgiou, A., & Kollin, J. S. (2017). Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4), 1-16. doi:10.1145/3072959.3073610</ref>
	~~<ref name="HowardRogers2012Vol3">Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2012). Perceiving in Depth, Volume 3: Other Mechanisms of Depth Perception. Oxford University Press.</ref>~~
	<ref name="PubMedOcclusionAR">Kiyokawa, K., Billinghurst, M., Hayes, S. E., & Gupta, A. (2003). An occlusion-capable optical see-through head mount display for supporting co-located collaboration. Proceedings. ISMAR 2003. Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 133-141. doi:10.1109/ISMAR.2003.1240688</ref>
	<ref name="ChangEyeTrack2020">Chang, Jen-Hao Rick, et al. (2020). Toward a unified framework for hand-eye coordination in virtual reality. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE.</ref>
	<ref name="WillemsenHMD2009">Willemsen, Peter, Colton, M. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 6(2), 1-14.</ref>
	<ref name="WannAdaptation1995">Wann, John P., Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision research, 35(19), 2731-2736.</ref>		<ref name="WannAdaptation1995">Wann, John P., Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision research, 35(19), 2731-2736.</ref>
	<ref name="ShibataComfortZone2011">Shibata, Takashi, Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., & Banks, M. S. (2011). The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of vision, 11(8), 11-11.</ref>		<ref name="ShibataComfortZone2011">Shibata, Takashi, Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., & Banks, M. S. (2011). The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of vision, 11(8), 11-11.</ref>
	<ref name="DuchowskiDoF2014">Duchowski, Andrew T., et al. (2014). Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 34(5), 34-41.</ref>		<ref name="DuchowskiDoF2014">Duchowski, Andrew T., et al. (2014). Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 34(5), 34-41.</ref>
	~~<ref name="ErnstCrossModal2002">Ernst, Marc O., and Martin S. Banks. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433.</ref>~~
	<ref name="MildenhallNeRF2020">Mildenhall, Ben, et al. (2020). Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham.</ref>		<ref name="MildenhallNeRF2020">Mildenhall, Ben, et al. (2020). Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham.</ref>
	</references>		</references>